so plasmas are expensive to run, thats why lcd better, i didnt buy the tv to save electricity i bought it to enjoy lol
also note the fact the one i have is a neo plasma, the latest gen plasma use a lot less energy then previous versions.
the absolute only thing better on an lcd is the brightness (in my eyes a bad thing anyway) everything else is better on plasma,
do some googleing look for recent reviews from audiophiles not dodgy sales pitch type crap
All the ways you wish you could be, that’s me. I look like you wanna look, I f*#k like you wanna f*#k, I am smart, capable, and most importantly, I am free in all the ways that you are not.
so plasmas are expensive to run, thats why lcd better, i didnt buy the tv to save electricity i bought it to enjoy lol
also note the fact the one i have is a neo plasma, the latest gen plasma use a lot less energy then previous versions.
the absolute only thing better on an lcd is the brightness (in my eyes a bad thing anyway) everything else is better on plasma,
do some googleing look for recent reviews from audiophiles not dodgy sales pitch type crap
NeoPlasma by Panasonic is just a last ditch attempt at trying to get people to buy plasmas. They are going to be phased out even if the technological advances will make them less power hungry. They break down quicker, long-time still imaging will never be resolved…LCDs will and are already take(ing) over. Sorry but I have been monitoring both the flatscreen technologies and Plasmas started of well but LCDs are on par, if not better, than plasmas now. Still many older LCD models lack the image quality that plasmas can deliver but the newer LCD models are as good.
My opinon on this but its how I see things goin along atm between LCD/Plasma.
LED’s ftw.
by hillyjnr » Mon Oct 17, 2011 2:28 pm
I didnt track him.. my mouse got stuck
LED’s ftw.
*cough* OLED FTW!!!
Your an inbecile full stop.
noobItUp <> sorry I started playing with butz again
LED’s ftw.
*cough* OLED FTW!!!
*cough* average efficiencies and longevity *cough* needs more improvement *cough*
They are getting there slowly but OLEDs are at about 40-50 lumes per Watt, which is lower than fluorescent tubes.
Recently a group has developed efficiency in the 90s! Have a read of the nature article of this groups work.
^Who cares about efficiencies when I can just roll the TV up and smack some sense into you all whilst watching some porn, the cricket and some other shit on the picture in picture screen.
Your an inbecile full stop.
noobItUp <> sorry I started playing with butz again
