Re: Heaset vs headphones & stand alone mic?
Death_Reincarnated said:
@nelots you stick to your business side of things and I'll stick to the science and physical use of audio devices. I've spent alot of my highschool years in the audio/video technology area and understanding it and in terms of audio quality these days...you CAN get good audio quality with average materials because the cost of production, assembly and extras does not inflate the price so much...its the fact that it may hold new features, more difficult production techniques, security, shipping etc and alot of the external factors. Just look how advanced the chinese/japanse electronics market is...at low prices with lots of features in general.
Yes death, the sound qualities of plastic vs steel vs wood vs anodized aluminum etc are equal along with the cost of the material! and thats without including the molding process.
Chinese/Japanese markets are cheaper due to their mass production lines and lower cost of labor. Employers there don't have to pay sick leave, super contributions or any employee benefits. Average worker over there makes less than $5USD per day compared to other countries which have minimum wage set at $10/hr.
Death_Reincarnated said:
The reason why I have asked why are headphones are dearer than earphones was because I know that both are made similarly and was considering that the price difference does not come from hardware/assembly but outside factors that come from the business sector...which is why I asked this becaue I thought you could help and anwser it since youre the so called succesfull businessman...but you had to bounce the ball sideways and attack my knowledge of science behind all of this...which I would assume you have little of.
How cute, this coming from a guy who claims the economy is driven by scientists.
Anyway there are various factors that contribute to the prices of which you will never understand due to your obvious over exposure to lead based batteries during your high school years.
As explained in my previous posts, materials, production, retail mark-ups and other operational expenses are factors and I thought the Bang & Olufsen mention was the nail in the head you needed to understand it but alas you've been able to stun me again with your level of intelligence.
Death_Reincarnated said:
The reason why I have compared the old radio to the new one was for one simple reason...both output decent audio quality yet in their times of just coming out, they both cost alot. Simple comparison which obviously you missed the point of /FF
Didn't I explain to you that new technology invokes new production procedures which will initially cost alot but eventually decrease as mass production methods are implemented? So obviously I missed the point and you're a fully sick scientist with years of experience, keep on driving out economy death but don't accelerate too fast or people will be pissed off at you for enticing the RBA to raise interest rates again!!!