SAMPSON said:anyways not much else to say.
You got that mixed up frog, Magnum's the sissy in the tight hot pants + stashe and Macgyvers the manly one with his swiss army knife, duct tape and uber leather jacket!!!Frogma said:Do you prefer the sissy Macgyver or the manly Magnum P.I.?
ill get back to you on that one...Frogma said:Do you prefer the sissy Macgyver or the manly Magnum P.I.?
personal: im in year 11, i live in Australia ,-OZ-superMINGE said:SAMPSON said:anyways not much else to say.
Not much else to say?? Tell us about yourself man! lol who you are, what you do, where you're from.
Welcome!
You really think that a man with his little arts and craft supplies and his rediculously over-compensating leather jacket is more manly than a guy who most of the time wears nothing but a mo? You can argue Macgyver over Magnum in some departments, but certainly not in the topic of masculinity.nelots said:You got that mixed up frog, Magnum's the sissy in the tight hot pants + stashe and Macgyvers the manly one with his swiss army knife, duct tape and uber leather jacket!!!
Firstly, Yes you should, although we all know the outcome, Ninja's > pirates-OZ-noobItUp said:Hey frog, just wondering where you stand on the Pirates Vs Ninjas debate?
Should I fire up a separate thread for that?
Antagonist said:Firstly, Yes you should, although we all know the outcome, Ninja's > pirates-OZ-noobItUp said:Hey frog, just wondering where you stand on the Pirates Vs Ninjas debate?
Should I fire up a separate thread for that?
a group of ninja's would of made Spartans piss
I think there is only 1 person that could take on Chuck-OZ-noobItUp said:Well moe, recalling my secondary schooling - debates usually have 2 side that are aguable. Clearly your debate is missing another side. No-one can argue against the chuck.