• Changes to Server go to this thread http://overzealousgamers.com/threads/etpub-changelog.6665/

I'm sorry but we blew up your laptop

the whole cake

Well-Known Member
-OZ-Trigger Happy said:
There will never be a world without war and ideologies will always be involved.
Look at the World Wars, were we supposed to just sit back and let another country take over our own and then we just go "cool man lets all have some beers". I don't think so. Much of what you guys are saying here is insulting to many people through your naive views of the world, much of which I doubt you have even been out and experienced. While I understand it is an opinion you are sharing, try to tone it down and stop generalising things because it really does just make you look stupid.

Cheers
To be honest, us in the western world have a much better understanding of the situation than the average person in the middle east. Why? Because we're not oppressed, and we have 101 different avenues to obtain information from all sides in the region, whether it be official or unofficial sources. And, we are educated. And, we have a birds-eye view of the situation.
And no, its not 'stupid' to say that they need to chillax over there. Being couch-critics of the middle east we can easily look back on the history and make proper judgement calls without being bias.

And, we can generalize. Because we're smart. We are developing nanotech car windows which clean themselves where we live. Over there its time to quit the bollocks, give-up the blame game and start again. Their current approach isnt working obviously. But, its not just a case of just -telling- them to chillax. The implementation, eg how to go about it, is beyond me.

In other words I am not smart enough to come up with a solution to the problem, however I can at least summarize what the problem is.

Cake wins. :flamer:
 

Trigger Happy

Moderator
Yes clearly saying they need to chillax is obviously a smart and educated response to the issue.
I'm not saying they shouldn't but again it is naive to say things like that when there are many issues there that you probably do not know/care about. We may have avenues of knowledge but many of those are biased, as much as you would like to think otherwise.
What I do find funny is how your arguements actually stem from your opinion over biased views. Shall we review? You were saying they were stupid to shoot the bag and then somehow from this incident you go on to say how bad the area etc etc. Yet from this "birds eye view" of yours you should know that standard practice is to defuse or blow up articles that are left UNATTENDED. Again another point of view that you created is the fact that their ideologies do not count.
For someone who claims to be educated, saying that other people's ideologies or religions are wrong and should be stopped is very simplistic and as I said, makes you look stupid. We could flip the argument and say that the USA should just turn to a dictatorship so that we can get along with countries such as Afghanistan. This is clearly a flawed view, as is the one where people should just stop what they believe in :p. Don't get me wrong, I do not agree with the conflict over there, but it will never end and it just annoys me when simplistic people say things like "duh they should just stop" without giving real thought to what they are actually saying.
Cake certainty wins in his own little world where serious global issues seem not to apply.

Cheers
 

nelots

Well-Known Member
the whole cake said:
To be honest, us in the western world have a much better understanding of the situation than the average person in the middle east. Why? Because we're not oppressed, and we have 101 different avenues to obtain information from all sides in the region, whether it be official or unofficial sources. And, we are educated. And, we have a birds-eye view of the situation.
And no, its not 'stupid' to say that they need to chillax over there. Being couch-critics of the middle east we can easily look back on the history and make proper judgement calls without being bias.
Your couch-critic views should stay in your lounge room as land issues with both political and religious significance will surely be way more complicated than your last major lounge room problem of where the hell did that TV remote go.
Being oppressed doesn't necessarily mean the locals have no idea as in most cases information will be passed on verbally from generation to generation.
Your 101 different avenues to obtain information from both sides is flawed because guess where the sources of these information come from...... Yes thats right, the source of majority of the information, official or unofficial comes from the locals on the scene.
Judgment calls without bias... I doubt that since stories told by both sides are biased to their own cause so you're more inclined to siding with the most convincing story.

the whole cake said:
And, we can generalize. Because we're smart. We are developing nanotech car windows which clean themselves where we live. Over there its time to quit the bollocks, give-up the blame game and start again. Their current approach isnt working obviously. But, its not just a case of just -telling- them to chillax. The implementation, eg how to go about it, is beyond me.
In other words I am not smart enough to come up with a solution to the problem, however I can at least summarize what the problem is.
Cake wins. :flamer:
Generalizing is ok because we're smart??? Ok then you surely shouldn't be commenting on world events because everyone knows computer nerds have no idea about real world events and can only be a reliable source of information from the realms of World of Warcraft.

@The Admiral - People actually do holiday in the Middle-East, I for one did. Contrary to popular views the Middle-East is actually pretty safe to travel around provided you move around the safe zones. Just for your information, not everyone that takes holidays will visit countries just to visit tourist attractions. To me I find tourist attractions overrated as they're a mecca for overpriced crap with over crowded foreigners whose main aim is to brag about their own country and thats on top of the hordes of old people.
War and violence?? it's no different in the Western World. In America there are ghetto slums, red light districts are also hot spots for crime. Even Sydney is no different, I mean try strolling through Mount Druitt late at night dressed as a foreign tourist.
 

the whole cake

Well-Known Member
Krikey.
Ok you two first of all are muddling up everyone elses posts with mine. And secondly - yes, yes we are smart. We are very smart and we have a huge wealth of knowledge on the entire region. We dont have some 'bias' or 'incomplete view' of whats going on there at all. Thats complete crap.

And yes, it is a smart thing to say they need to chillax. I'm sick to death of hearing 'oh but but there really is a reason for the violence. we just dont appreciate XYZ'.
Well here's the bottom line. Its old. Its an old conflict. There has been freaking way long enough time for everyone to learn all about what is going on over there.

And we are smart, and yes we can generalize because have had the time to. I'm sick of people trying to enforce some kind of 'open mindedness' because of a perceived lack of appreciation for something. Seriously - I already know all about this crap. Its pathetic. After all the years of studying, hearing about it in the news, all the history... yes, its just pathetic.
Its human beings fighting FIRST. And XYZ value statement second.

Look you cant win. Cake says its a pathetic conflict, and it is. We have had the time/resources to understand all about the conflict over there. Thats cake's statement. Don't argue with me on this one. Go fucken argue with someone involved with the conflict. I'm too lazy to.
 

Trigger Happy

Moderator
Well I guess we can agree to disagree here. You say it is a pathetic conflict, I think it is more that your view of what is happening is flawed.

Cheers
 

the whole cake

Well-Known Member
How about, calling someones perception flawed based on what their opinion of the events, is flawed. You have assumed that my opinion of known information directly represents what information I have about the situation. Thats wrong.

I have access to the same information as many others. Others can say different things about the same information. I call it pathetic. Thats a judgment call the whole cake has made, based on all of his world experience and ethos, combined with the information which others also have access to.
Cake calls it pathetic. You may not. But that by no way is any indication that cake has a less-than-informed opinion, just because you disprove. Now its a retarded situation over there, and we are 10 fold superior socially. We have every right to broadcast our opinion and thats exactly what the whole cake does. Cake is smart, well informed and at liberty to say what he thinks. Over in the middle east all they are smart. But thats not enough.
 

nelots

Well-Known Member
the whole cake said:
Krikey.
Ok you two first of all are muddling up everyone elses posts with mine. And secondly - yes, yes we are smart. We are very smart and we have a huge wealth of knowledge on the entire region. We dont have some 'bias' or 'incomplete view' of whats going on there at all. Thats complete crap.
And yes, it is a smart thing to say they need to chillax. I'm sick to death of hearing 'oh but but there really is a reason for the violence. we just dont appreciate XYZ'.
Well here's the bottom line. Its old. Its an old conflict. There has been freaking way long enough time for everyone to learn all about what is going on over there.
Being smart/intelligent doesn't mean you'll know/understand the entire story behind the conflict.
Having access to a "huge wealth of knowledge on the entire region," what does that really mean........
- biased stories from various victims of either side,
- media stories that are also biased since majority will focus on innocent victims to further their journalistic career, and/or
- government influenced media releases as a propaganda ploy to justify their cause.
"oh but but there really is a reason for the violence," of course there is otherwise there wouldn't be any conflict. So unless you're personally involved in the it you will never fully contemplate the full scope of the issues.

the whole cake said:
And we are smart, and yes we can generalize because have had the time to. I'm sick of people trying to enforce some kind of 'open mindedness' because of a perceived lack of appreciation for something. Seriously - I already know all about this crap. Its pathetic. After all the years of studying, hearing about it in the news, all the history... yes, its just pathetic.
Its human beings fighting FIRST. And XYZ value statement second.
You studied about their conflict so that makes you an expert on the matter? These people are fighting for land that holds religious significance, the issues are far more complex than what you may think it is.
If I was ever in such a predicament I'll most likely fight as well.
In the end, third party audiences can't really say what's right or wrong, what's right or wrong is determined by the individuals involved in the matter and their way of justifying their actions to their cause.
 

the whole cake

Well-Known Member
I really don't see what you're bringing to the table in this arguement. You started off questioning why I called it a pathetic conflict. Now all you're doing is nitpicking at faults in things I tell you. You're attempting to build some kind of image of the cake having a flakey impression of whats going on over there. Well yes theres loads of crap information out there. But its also rather easy to spot the crap. This conflict has been going on for a long time - its hard to hide the truth about it.

We have a vantage point beyond what those individuals involved in the conflict have. Yes they have a perspective, and we have a perspective. We are able to learn their perspectives. And we have. Getting bias information from all sides, we are able to construct vast amounts of history. This is called journalism.

They however are unable to learn our perspective because they are involved and/or inhibited by XYZ element such as ideology. Can you get a suicide bomber for 20 minutes to sit down & listen to you? Look we have a superior vantage-point to 99% of the people involved in the middle east conflict.

Its an on going game of tit for tat. Sure with rather important things at steak. At least initially. But that doesn't mean its any more justified. I've suffered retribution violence first hand. I wont go into the story but I suffered a disfigured face and brain damage because I was mistaken for someone else, and the attacker was 'getting back' at someone. I know a hell of a lot about how people work in conflict on large and small scale. And I call it pathetic. When doctors are fixing your face you'll have an opinion too.
 

The Admiral

Well-Known Member
nelots said:
@The Admiral - People actually do holiday in the Middle-East, I for one did. Contrary to popular views the Middle-East is actually pretty safe to travel around provided you move around the safe zones. Just for your information, not everyone that takes holidays will visit countries just to visit tourist attractions. To me I find tourist attractions overrated as they're a mecca for overpriced crap with over crowded foreigners whose main aim is to brag about their own country and thats on top of the hordes of old people.
War and violence?? it's no different in the Western World. In America there are ghetto slums, red light districts are also hot spots for crime. Even Sydney is no different, I mean try strolling through Mount Druitt late at night dressed as a foreign tourist.
Is it that sandy over there? I was quite surprised when my Mum's friend was telling me about how nice Perth is. In my head, it was like: middle of nowhere + desert + close to Indonesia/Africa thus lots of illegal immigrants, making it sound not very appealling at all. Apparently, it is fairly nice though. I think the cost of living there is still quite high though, due to how far goods need to be transported to get there - the bad part of middle of nowhere.

Dude. Sif not go to places just to go on roller coasters!
 

the whole cake

Well-Known Member
I think maybe the difference is that in Aussie if you run into trouble, you have a stable govt/country to supply help in the form of hellicopters, rescue people, suport etc.

But in the middle east, the closest thing you'll get is some buttwipe who'll blow you up cos you look like an enemy
 

nelots

Well-Known Member
The Admiral said:
Is it that sandy over there? I was quite surprised when my Mum's friend was telling me about how nice Perth is. In my head, it was like: middle of nowhere + desert + close to Indonesia/Africa thus lots of illegal immigrants, making it sound not very appealling at all. Apparently, it is fairly nice though. I think the cost of living there is still quite high though, due to how far goods need to be transported to get there - the bad part of middle of nowhere.
Yes, Perth is close to AFRICA.......... :lol:
I'm sure there are more illegal immigrants residing in other capital cities due to the fact that there are more visa over stayers than there are boat people.
Think of Perth as a younger version of Bris-Vegas, nice beaches, easy going people minus the crowds and excessive concrete jungle skyline. The lifestyle there is good and yes the cost of living is higher but the average wage is higher too so it all evens out.
Anyway with the Middle-East, it depends where you go. If you visit the major cities then its not sandy but get on the beaten track to rural areas then its dusty just like any other place around the world.

The Admiral said:
Dude. Sif not go to places just to go on roller coasters!
Roller coasters are for kids, I ride fighter jets :)
 

The Admiral

Well-Known Member
nelots said:
Yes, Perth is close to AFRICA.......... :lol:
I'm sure there are more illegal immigrants residing in other capital cities due to the fact that there are more visa over stayers than there are boat people.
Think of Perth as a younger version of Bris-Vegas, nice beaches, easy going people minus the crowds and excessive concrete jungle skyline. The lifestyle there is good and yes the cost of living is higher but the average wage is higher too so it all evens out.
Anyway with the Middle-East, it depends where you go. If you visit the major cities then its not sandy but get on the beaten track to rural areas then its dusty just like any other place around the world.
I meant closer than Brisbane. Boats etc would head for there.

It sounds pretty nice. Might add it to my list of cities that would be interesting to live and work in.

nelots said:
Roller coasters are for kids, I ride fighter jets :)
Aaah, true that. Not quite all of us have that money though.
 
Top