Death_Reincarnated said:
This isnt a specialised case. ..... eventually lead a person with educational qualifications to become a corporate lawyer.
Way to mangle things up with the coveted D_R touch.
You can't be a Corporate Lawyer on an Arts Degree period same as you can't be an Electrician on a Physics Degree.
Death_Reincarnated said:
As for the so called 'specialised extenstions' ......Realy you could do better; shame on you.
Yeah, shame on me for not understanding but props on managing to construct such easy to read sentences.
Death_Reincarnated said:
I havent gone too technical on anything and any reply which refused to acknowledge what I'm saying was from person(s) who have no idea in the first place.
So timewilltell has no idea either when he said your PMPO/Square-root doesn't apply here? It doesn't take a genius to figure out PMPO(Peak Music Power Output) relates to audio but hey the fundamentals are there so YOU'RE RIGHT!
Death_Reincarnated said:
Its like telling a child 'do you want some sucrose or carbohydrates?' ....someone like me is the other person.
Nice analogy there D_R and it's true, when we're in a playground full of toddlers, you really would be the idiot asking the kids whether they'd want 'sucrose or carbs.'
Death_Reincarnated said:
Since no-one knew .....reasonable to say RMS/PMPO than the other.
Nice, first you provide us with that ingenious application of PMPO/Square-root = actual power and now you're changing it to 'square-root of 2' is the value...... its more reasonable to say RMS/PMPO???'
You can't even get the formula right and you expect me to trust your word without question because you're "QUALIFIED" in PHYSICS?
Want me to call Mensa so I can bask in your intelligence?
Death_Reincarnated said:
Really? So its good enough to rip out wiki/forum quotes to make assumptions and conclusions..... if someone has an advanced knowledge in a topic why not share it - or should it all be kept to wikiquotes like you suggested?
Really, I determine my opinion/views based on wiki quotes and randomly searched forum posts?
See me providing various outdated links or any reference to wikipedia in my posts?
You really need to get off that 'advanced knowledge' high horse, reality can be a hard pill to swallow.
Death_Reincarnated said:
So what gives you the right? Please tell me because I have not once insulted you ....
Read this
http://mw2.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/insult , its the definition of the word insult and if you don't understand it then read this one as it's more suited to your english level
http://www.learnersdictionary.com/search/insult.
Death_Reincarnated said:
You call that entertainment or just a way to make fun of someone when you cannot rebuttal.
I'm pretty sure my rebuttal makes sense to others but for some reason because I lack the D_R touch, you don't understand. I guess I have to stop posting to the point and murder the English language to get you to understand.
Death_Reincarnated said:
So all of my counter arguments have stemmed through someone elses responses?
Yes, counter arguments or any argument for that stems from other people's responses/views unless you were countering yourself all this time?
Death_Reincarnated said:
I also have failed to comprehand your posts? Seriously those are two big assumptions which you have made. ... maybe then youd get a clue
They're "BIG ASSUMPTIONS" only in D_R's world but watch out, reality can BITE!
Death_Reincarnated said:
I'm making this assumptiom because not even once have I read anything from you that remotly resembles a 'i'm wrong' especially towards me.
Am I suppose to admit being wrong for questioning PMPO/Square-root=actual power or was that RMS/PMPO??? wait why are we using RMS when "Square-root" is the lingo???
Anyway just to show I am humble, I will admit it, I did something wrong in my last post. So to everyone, I apologize for the error and I've taken the liberty of correcting that error and hope you all can look past it in hindsight. Please enjoy my revised PMPO/Square-root=actual power v2.0
Death_Reincarnated said:
Then why not separate them ..... nothing new and its more of a personal vandata because of these situations.
Harden up princess, there is no vendetta, I just hate seeing people being misinformed by so called "QUALIFIED" individuals.
Death_Reincarnated said:
Sure i've made mistakes before and I admited to them - mostly to do with the technical side of ET
You sure fooled me on that one.
Death_Reincarnated said:
sure i'll admit I was wrong at times if havent before.
Nice follow up sentence to the one above....... SOUNDS LIKE A CONUNDRUM!!! OMG CAN ANYONE ELSE CONFIRM????? IF SO I CAN CHECK THIS FROM MY BUCKET LIST!!!!!
BUCKET LIST #9823482374 - use the word CONUNDRUM.
Death_Reincarnated said:
What you are suggesting is that you are indeed mocking me in this thread and at recent time which would make you a liar that the pics are purely there for the entertainment for others and have no other purpose.
Yeah, I lied, you mad? want tissues? Still, it keeps readers from dozing off and also I hoped the picture would be easier for you to understand since you have such a hard time comprehending my posts in text form.
Death_Reincarnated said:
if that is how you understood it then it was not meant to sound like that. I meant that I understood this value to be associated with early RAMs but only commented on this on page 8 since things didnt add up, also there wasnt much interest about this untill page 8.
You're so quick to jump on my so called 'mistakes' yet you let that one go for so long? Yeah, I believe you because you have a Physics degree.
Death_Reincarnated said:
Ok so 1GB (or 1024MB) .....So you see nelots - stop talking crap already!
Your 'in general' is wrong - its misleading and bad advice anyhow.
I'm sorry, for someone of your intellect I assumed you'd know more but way to show you lack of "general knowledge" right?
I did mention the following "in general" assumptions:
nelots said:
In general" DDR3 came out as 1GB stick modules(ie: 1GB DDR3 etc etc)
"In general" a DDR3 module is fitted with 8 IC chips. Sure there are different chip configurations amongst the various manufacturers but I'm taking about 'in general.'
http://www.valueram.com/datasheets/KHX1600C9D3B1_2G.pdf read the product description, "based on..," that is a 1 stick 2GB module.
http://www.valueram.com/datasheets/KHX1 ... 1K2_2G.pdf read the product description, "based on...," that is a 2 stick 2GB module.
Both above confirms the 8 IC chips per module(stick) assumption I made.
I based my calculations on the 1GB module(which I had stated) thus 4GB is 4x1GB modules.
So am I still wrong with no clue?
Death_Reincarnated said:
Yes because you just pointed out he obvious VVV
With posts like that how could I possibly question or match your academic brilliance......
WHAT WAS I THINKING!!!!!
Death_Reincarnated said:
How about actually trying to understand where that figure came from without stating the obvious
If it was so obvious why would anyone question it and why didn't anyone correct it earlier???
Death_Reincarnated said:
It wasnt intended for any comedic purposes - it was to indicate (by visual way) my response and to keep the vieweres interested, like you suggested.
Your 'hahahaha' pic was a nice attempt at keeping the 'viewers interested.'